Contributed by: Kentucky Department of Education (KDE)
SCORING GUIDES
KIRIS Performance Event, Grade 12
1993-1994
Task: S/SS1 -- Old Problems -- New Solutions
There are three scoring guides for this task, for questions 1
through 3 on the student response form.
Score all questions for both science and social studies.
Group Activity
Question 1
SCORE |
DESCRIPTION |
4 |
Chart is completely filled out with detailed, correct
information (see chart below). |
3 |
Chart is completely filled out with correct information
but lacks detail, or is almost completely filled out with correct
information and detail. |
2 |
Half or more of chart is filled out with correct
information. |
1 |
Less than half of chart is filled out with correct
information. |
0 |
Response is totally incorrect or irrelevant. |
Blank |
No response. |
|
Conditions Before Mine |
Conditions After Mine |
Land use |
Coal mining and forestry |
Agriculture, horticulture (cows, swine, chickens,
orchards, vineyards, etc.) |
Control of Land |
Over half controlled by Pocahontas Development
Corp. for timber and mining |
Pocahontas and Martiki partnership with MSU |
Topography |
Rugged steeply pitched mountain, narrow valley
floors, 600-700' relief with ridges about 1400' above sea level
and valleys about 700' |
2:.1 pitch maximum, terracing and benching, gently
rolling land, flat to moderate slope. |
Plants/Vegetation |
Second and third growth forest: upland hardwood,
tulip poplar, sugar maple, beech, white and other oaks, hickory |
Permanent grasses and legumes, pastures, trees,
orchards |
Animals/Wildlife |
[Article doesn't mention] |
Dramatic increase in wildlife, domestic animals;
swine, poultry, and beef |
Economy of Area |
Tied to forestry and mining |
Increase in manufacturing, transportation, wholesale
trade, retail trade, business and repairs, recreation, health,
professional services, public administration |
Soil |
Inadequate, thin, low nutrient content, poor moisture
holding capacity, slightly acidic |
Increased organic matter, nutrient levels, better
quality |
Water |
Inadequate for domestic use, primary sources associated
with valley floor |
Two new reservoirs and numerous small ponds, meets
federal standards |
Other |
[other information from article not mentioned
in categories above] |
New airport, duck refuge, golf course (proposed)
in Martin County |
Individual Activity
Question 2
SCORE |
DESCRIPTION |
4 |
Student presents a thorough, detailed discussion
of both required components (see below) |
3 |
Student presents a good discussion of both required
components. Response may contain minor flaws and/or one required
component may lack details. |
2 |
Student presents a good discussion of both required
component or a fair discussion of both. Response may contain
flaws. |
1 |
Student presents a poor, limited discussion or
a list of one or both required components. |
0 |
Response is totally incorrect or irrelevant. |
Blank |
No response. |
Required components:
- Description based on the group information, of how effectively
the reclamation process analyzed environmental impact.
- Examples of other factors (for a level 3 or 4, several should
be addressed):
- Changes in wildlife species, patterns, populations, etc.
- Problems with introduction of domestic/alien species
- Reintroduction of native species
- Air pollution
- Changes in drainage patterns
- Impacts on food web
- Effects on local gene pool
Question 3
SCORE |
DESCRIPTION |
4 |
Student writes thorough description of pros and
cons of both environmental and economic impacts. |
3 |
Student writes good description of pros and cons
of both environmental and economic impacts. Response may contain
minor flaws and/or one section may lack details. |
2 |
Student writes a good description of pros and/or
cons of both environmental and economic impacts. Response may
contain flaws; one or two sections may lack detail or be absent. |
1 |
Student writes poor, minimal descriptions or merely
lists information. |
0 |
Response is totally incorrect or irrelevant. |
Blank |
No response. |
Examples of acceptable topics for pros and cons:
Pros:
- Enhanced economy
- Prevent erosion
- Prevent pollution of streams and creeks
- Aesthetics
- Safety
- Employment
- Cultural and social change/diversity
- Better land for farming
|
Cons:
- Native species removed
- Changes food webs
- Monoculture of crops/insect problems
- Nonrenewable resource gone
- Groundwater pollution from mine
- Change in native culture of region
- Change in local topography
|
|