Contributed by: New Standards (NS)
Scoring Guide: Tree Study - Question 1
2 |
The response includes accurate measurements for
at least three of the four leaves* (+/- 2 mm). The data is clearly
displayed and includes (A-D) for each measurement. A data table
may be included. Appropriate units of measure are indicated.
(*Reference values for measurements of each leaf, A-D: 69; 63;
77; 55.) |
1 |
The response might lack accurate measurements for
two or more leaves labels for leaves (A-D). The data display
may not be clearly labeled (A-D) or might be written such that
the leaf measurements cannot be read reliably. Units of measure
might be missing, inappropriate, or not match the numerical
values. |
0 |
The response might contain a restatement of the
question, but does not include adequate evidence of student
ability to use a ruler and/or organize and display data. Leaf
measurements might be inaccurate, lack appropriate units, and
lack labels. |
off topic |
The response might include marks, words, or phrases,
but the response is unrelated to the situation in the question. |
blank |
No marks were made in the student response section. |
Scoring Guide: Tree Study - Question 2
3 |
The response gives a reasonable estimate of the
length of the new leaf using available facts/observations to
support the assertion. (If the previous measurements made by
the student were accurate, the new leaf would be between 59
and 72 mm.) An explanation refers to the previous measurements
and suggests that the measurement range or other trend in the
data justifies the prediction. The response might include the
suggestion that most leaves of the same type are close to the
same size. The response demonstrates that the student is able
to generalize trends and identify patterns in data that was
collected in the previous activity. |
2 |
The response gives a reasonable estimate of the
length of the new leaf using available facts/observations but
the explanation might be vague, lack clarity, or is based on
faulty reasoning. The student attempts to use the available
data to support the prediction. The student might base the prediction
on an erroneous perception of a trend in the data, or an experience
other than the measurements made in question 1. Slight errors
in reasoning might be included. The response demonstrates that
the student has some ability to generalize trends in data. |
1 |
The response attempts to give an estimate of the
length of the new leaf, but the explanation is missing or flawed
in the logic used. Alternatively, the estimate might be outside
the range of the previously measured leaves (A-D) or unrelated
to previous measurements. The response demonstrates that the
student has limited ability to generalize trends and identify
patterns. |
0 |
The response might not give an estimate of the
length of the new leaf; or, if given, the estimate is not reasonable
and not supported. The question may be restated, but the response
does not include evidence that the student is able to generalize
trends or identify patterns. |
off topic |
The response might include marks, words, or phrases,
but the response is unrelated to the situation in the question. |
blank |
No marks were made in the student response section. |
Scoring Guide: Tree Study - Question 3
2 |
Two reasonable sources of error are described.
These might include, but are not limited to, lack of skill in
using a ruler, inaccuracy of the ruler itself, mistakes in student
judgment, distractions during the measurement procedure, and/or
misunderstanding the directions. (The response "measured wrong"
or something analogous is not acceptable.) The response indicates
that the student is able to evaluate the reasonableness of data
and recognize possible sources of error in measurements. |
1 |
An attempt to identify or describe a possible source
of error, but might be vague or include misconceptions about
measuring in general. The response indicates that the student
has limited ability to understand the reasonableness of data
or recognize possible sources of error in measurements |
0 |
There is little or no evidence that the task was
successfully completed. The response might be a restatement
of the question, but does not include evidence that the student
is able to evaluate the reasonableness of data or recognize
possible sources of error in measurements |
off topic |
The response might include marks, words, or phrases,
but the response is unrelated to the situation in the question. |
blank |
No marks were made in the student response section. |
Scoring Guide: Tree Study - Question 4
2 |
The response includes at least two reasonable questions
about trees that could be studied by 4th graders. The questions
are clearly stated, are distinct from each other and are suitable
for scientific study, experimentation, and/or data collection.
The answers to the student generated questions would potentially
increase the student's knowledge and/or understanding of the
characteristics of trees. |
1 |
The response includes at least one reasonable
question about trees that could be studied by 4th graders. The
question is clearly stated and suitable for scientific study,
experimentation, and/or data collection. A second question,
if included, might be stated, or is not distinct from the previous
question. The answers to at least one question would potentially
increase the student's knowledge and/or understanding of the
characteristics of trees. |
0 |
The response might contain actual fragments of
material from the prompt, but the attempt to formulate questions
suitable for scientific experimentation are not successful. |
off topic |
The response might include marks, words, or phrases,
but the response is unrelated to the situation in the question. |
blank |
No marks were made in the student response section. |
|