administration student task rubric student work technical quality
 
Soiled Again
Technical Quality Information
Contributed by: Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT)



These data were prepared by staff from the Division of Teaching and Learning at the Connecticut State Department of Education based on a 1994 administration field test.

Total N = 35,000

Question
Number

Students Statewide Who Received Each Score
Score 3 Score 2 Score 1 Score 0
N % N % N % N %
1 3500 10 13,650 39 11,550 33 5950 17
2 7700 22 12,600 36 8400 24 4200 12
3 7000 20 9100 26 11,550 33 6300 18
4 4200 12 7000 20 9800 28 12,250 35

Development Process:

Content Review
Content Experts (Curriculum Directors), Science Teachers, and Supervisors
Sensitivity Review
Committee convened comprised of content experts and science teachers
How were tasks reviewed?
Committee convened at Connecticut Department of Education

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administration Information:

Demographics of Students Tested

Gender
Represented - over 100 students
Ethnicity
Represented - over 100 students
Socio-economic status
Represented - over 100 students
Disability
Represented - over 100 students
Limited-English proficient
Represented - over 100 students

 

Number of Students Tested

For each task, over 1000 students per grade level were tested.

 

Reliability and Additional Analyses:

Interrater Reliability
Yes - interrater reliability was over 85%. Reliability varied by subject matter and type of item.
Generalizability Studies
Yes- cut scores and internal consistency were measured.

 


©1997-2005 SRI International. All rights reserved. Terms of Use