administration student task rubric student work technical quality
 
Soapy Water
Examples of Student Work
Contributed by: Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT)

Students in a science class were conducting experiments to explore the use of various substances in removing soap from the water. One way to remove soap from water is to have it react with other substances. When the reactions occur, a solid called a precipitate is sometimes formed. A precipitate can be filtered out of the water.

Group A carried out the following experiment.

  1. We put soapy water into three separate plastic cups.
  2. A different substance was added to each of the cups.
  3. After waiting five minutes, the mixture in each cup was filtered.
  4. We examined the precipitate (which remained in the filter paper) and the filtrate (which was in the test tube) for each mixture.


The table below shows our results.

1 2 3
Substance added to Soapy Water Epsom Salt Table Salt Sugar
Precipitate White, milky White, milky None
Filtrate Clear Slightly cloudy Cloudy


Question 1 - Event Score = 2

Based on their results, Group A concluded that Epsom salt removed the soap from the water. Is this a valid conclusion? Explain your answer fully.



Component
Score
Commentary
Question 1
(2)
The response correctly questions the validity of the conclusion. It explains that, "Just because the water looks clear it doesn't mean that it has no soap in it." It explains that a shake test should have been performed. No other considerations are discussed, and it is therefore less complete than the score 3 responses.



Question 2 - Event Score = 2

Do you have enough information to replicate Group A's experiment? If you think so, explain what information you have. If you think not, explain what other information you would need.





Component
Score
Commentary
Question 2
(2)
The response correctly states that there is not enough information to replicate the experiment. It explains that the amounts of materials added to the soapy water are needed and should be controlled. Other missing information is not mentioned, and so the response is less complete than the score 3 responses.




Group B carried out the following experiment.

  1. We placed 50 mL of soapy water into three plastic cups.
  2. We added 10 grams of sugar to cup 1, 10 grams of table salt to cup 2, and 10 grams of Epsom salt to cup 3. We mixed each with a plastic spoon.
  3. We filtered all three mixtures.
  4. We then poured the filtrate (remaining liquid) into 3 separate test tubes, shook them and measured the height of the soap suds.


The table below shows our results.

Cup Substance Final Soap Suds Height
1 Sugar 9.1 cm
2 Table Salt 1.2 cm
3 Epsom Salt 0.2 cm


Question 3 - Event Score = 2

Group B did not include a control in their experiment. What would be an appropriate control? Explain your answer fully, including how the control might improve the experiment.





Component
Score
Commentary
Question 3
(2)
The response is correct but less elaborated than the score 3 responses. There is no mention of the fact that the control should be shaken after filtering and the suds measured and compared to the others.



Question 4 - Event Score = 2

Compare Group A's and Group B's experiments. Which experiment, if either, is better designed? Explain your answer fully.





Component
Score
Commentary
Question 4
(2)
The response discusses one reason why Group B's experiment was better (use of shake test) and explains that neither group included a control. It is less complete than the score 3 responses.


Previous Student Work | Next Student Work

 


©1997-2005 SRI International. All rights reserved. Terms of Use