administration student task rubric student work technical quality
 
Soapy Water
Examples of Student Work
Contributed by: Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT)

Students in a science class were conducting experiments to explore the use of various substances in removing soap from the water. One way to remove soap from water is to have it react with other substances. When the reactions occur, a solid called a precipitate is sometimes formed. A precipitate can be filtered out of the water.

Group A carried out the following experiment.

  1. We put soapy water into three separate plastic cups.
  2. A different substance was added to each of the cups.
  3. After waiting five minutes, the mixture in each cup was filtered.
  4. We examined the precipitate (which remained in the filter paper) and the filtrate (which was in the test tube) for each mixture.


The table below shows our results.

1 2 3
Substance added to Soapy Water Epsom Salt Table Salt Sugar
Precipitate White, milky White, milky None
Filtrate Clear Slightly cloudy Cloudy


Question 1 - Event Score = 1

Based on their results, Group A concluded that Epsom salt removed the soap from the water. Is this a valid conclusion? Explain your answer fully.



Component
Score
Commentary
Question 1
(1)
The response correctly interprets the results of the experiment to support the conclusion but fails to discuss any factors that call the validity of the conclusion into question. The response is therefore a marginal answer to the question.



Question 2 - Event Score = 1

Do you have enough information to replicate Group A's experiment? If you think so, explain what information you have. If you think not, explain what other information you would need.





Component
Score
Commentary
Question 2
(1)
The response correctly states that there is not enough information to replicate the experiment. The description of the information needed is vague ("I would need exact amounts to use for all the variables") and therefore does not receive a higher score.




Group B carried out the following experiment.

  1. We placed 50 mL of soapy water into three plastic cups.
  2. We added 10 grams of sugar to cup 1, 10 grams of table salt to cup 2, and 10 grams of Epsom salt to cup 3. We mixed each with a plastic spoon.
  3. We filtered all three mixtures.
  4. We then poured the filtrate (remaining liquid) into 3 separate test tubes, shook them and measured the height of the soap suds.


The table below shows our results.

Cup Substance Final Soap Suds Height
1 Sugar 9.1 cm
2 Table Salt 1.2 cm
3 Epsom Salt 0.2 cm


Question 3 - Event Score = 1

Group B did not include a control in their experiment. What would be an appropriate control? Explain your answer fully, including how the control might improve the experiment.





Component
Score
Commentary
Question 3
(1)
The response correctly explains that "the height of the soap suds before being filtered" would give the group something to compare their final results to, but fails to describe a control in which nothing is added to the soapy water.



Question 4 - Event Score = 1

Compare Group A's and Group B's experiments. Which experiment, if either, is better designed? Explain your answer fully.





Component
Score
Commentary
Question 4
(1)
The response contains one element of a proficient response by correctly stating Group B's experiment was better designed because "they showed how they controlled each substance." A poor explanation is offered for why Group A's experiment is better.


Previous Student Work | Next Student Work

 


©1997-2005 SRI International. All rights reserved. Terms of Use